Vote vs. Bay'ah - Dr. Israr Ahmad

19 Bekeken
Dr. Israr Ahmad
Dr. Israr Ahmad
11/27/25

Dr. Israr Ahmad elucidates the distinction between voting (a form of consultation) and *bay'ah* (allegiance). He explains how both processes were employed in early Islamic history, citing the example of the selection of caliphs after Umar. Voting represents a method of gathering opinions to determine leadership, while *bay'ah* is a pledge of allegiance and obedience to the chosen leader. He contrasts this with the modern understanding of party politics and leadership selection. He highlights that *bay'ah* is not merely a contract but a commitment to support and obey, and explores the role of *ahl al-hal wal 'aqd* (those who decide and bind) in shaping Islamic governance. The lecture also touches upon the potential for universal suffrage within an Islamic framework.

  • categorie

Laat meer zien

0 Comments Sorteer op

Geen reacties gevonden

Volgende